Batman Shooting: Bad Tradecraft-Staged Govt PsyOp? (continued) by JIM STONE
None for the emergency exit, none from inside the screening room, none from the lobby, none from the parking lot, we got NADA. None from a cell phone cam, absolutely NOTHING.
Furthermore, the theater was a very nice modern theater which would have had those things in working order, and what about the mall itself? No footage from the mall either? Think about that. Why not?
On top of that, we got no pictures after the fact from the inside of the theater. NONE, NADA. No bullet holes, no gas canisters, no shell casings, no blood on the floor, NOTHING. Why not?
On the outside of the theater, in the back, there was blood on the sidewalk. But there is one problem with it. First and foremost, the spatters were CLEAN. NO FOOTSTEPS in them.
People with some exposure to forensics who have posted on my forum have said that at crime scenes the blood ALWAYS has footprints in it, because it is impossible to stay away from it. Purportedly the blood on the ground was from someone carrying the little girl. In that case, whoever was carrying her would have stepped in the blood while carrying her, leaving bloody footprints and there were NONE. Furthermore, the blood spatters lead TOWARD the emergency exit, not away from it.
The only way these two things could coincide is if a setup team laid the blood scene out and screwed up doing it. This scene could have happened as photographed only if the blood was in a container at the end of a handle, keeping whoever was dumping it on the sidewalk far enough away to not get it on themselves or walk in it.
Stupid as they were, they started in the parking lot and worked their way toward the door, rather than starting at the door and working their way out into the parking lot. It's obvious in the following two photos.
So we have photos of blood outside, but none from inside. Perhaps because the theater owner did not agree to having a setup crew make a mess of his carpet.
Another thing that should be easy for most people to grasp that it was only a drill is the fact that the police tapes show that the police were discussing where to put the victim's families and press for photos, WHILE THE SHOOTING WAS IN PROGRESS.
At that point they would be clueless as to who the victims families even were, or how to get ahold of them, let alone GET THEM TO THE THEATER AT MIDNIGHT. In fact, why would the families even go to the theater? would the hospital be a better place for that? or do families let Bobby bleed out before getting into the ambulance just for a photo op?
This simple statement in the police tapes proves it was all a pre planned setup, with the families and press already on scene before it even started. If you have been bamboozled into believing people died in that theater, you really need to look at the evidence and switch on your B.S. detector.
Now that we have discussed the obvious, let's talk probabilities.
Two of the victims hit the social security death index before the others. They were Jessica Redfield/Ghawi and Alexander Teves
In the case of Jessica Redfield, who I have no doubt is sipping on a pina colada somewhere after a multi million dollar payout, we have a damning tweet where she was laughing about making people believe there is gunfire. Right from her twitter account.
I found this during a deep dredge of the evidence. Getting stuff like that is what I am known for. Ok, now that we have seen this tweet, let's talk about the other mass shooting Jessica supposedly witnessed.
Supposedly Jessica Redfield, a budding media presense, was in Toronto during a mass shooting there in a mall only a month before being "killed" in another "mass shooting". First of all, if she really did witness a mass shooting in Toronto a month before this tweet, why would she laugh? Pehaps if THAT shooting was fake as well? You don't laugh about things like that.
Second of all, figure the odds. Mass shootings happen about once every five years across the total population of the U.S. and Canada of approximately 370 million combined. With mass shootings occuring once every five years in that big of a population, witnessing two in such a short time span is technically impossible.
Let's do a little math here. She gets the first one FREE. So over the course of your lifetime there will be a total of 80 years divided by five, or 16 mass shootings. If 150 people witness each one, that's 16X150 or 2,400 possible witnesses. 370 million divided by 2,400 is a 1 in 154,000 chance of witnessing ONE mass shooting.
Now let's figure the odds of witnessing a second one. Take that 154,000 and multiply it against itself. That equals 1 in 23 billion (23,710,000,000) and that does not factor in the fact that the two shootings were so close.
So we have two damning things against Redfield, the tweet and those odds. How about a third little tidbit? In her tweets, she talked about moving into a new place with 7 swimming pools and a lake two weeks before the second shooting. She was an intern. How does an intern accomplish that? Perhaps a multi million dollar payout? If I had no morals, I'd love that job. 7 pools and a lake would be great for laying low until things settle down. After that, a facelift and a life in politics, because you proved your ability to keep your mouth shut about corruption.
Now on to other improbablilites. When doing a search of the names from Aurora on even a small search engine a week after the shooting, ALL VICTIMS FROM AURORA HAD:
1. A complete shutout of the first 50 hits on even a small search engine, as proven by this photo. Search engine hits
2. A memorial page on facebook.
3. A donation page, in their honor on facebook.
Let's contrast that with a real murder scene, the Sikh temple shooting.
Two of the people shut out the first 10 hits on Google, and one of them was the father of the Emmy award winning director Arm Kaleka, who was producing a major disclosure movie about government corruption, stealing of energy technologies, and hidden contact. These hits were because the alternative press covered the story. The others who died did not show up on Google at all. Arm Kaleka had received numerous threats that if he did not stop producing the movie, members of his family would be killed.
NONE of the people at the Sikh temple had a facebook page set up in their honor, nor were any donation pages set up. And attributing this to culture is not good enough, because Sikhs attend Bat Man movies, and not EVERYONE at Aurora would have put up a facebook page in the honor of their lost loved one. It just does not work that way unless it's all a pre planned psy op. These pages were made ahead of time, before the shooting and were simply posted at the "appropriate" time.
Let's look at the difference between the photos coming out of Aurora which was fake, and the Sikh temple where people actually died:
Now onto the harder details.
Let's look into this nurse who died in a lake near her home after tending to the injured from the "bat man shooting". I will tell you where the 10 victims who did not make the social security database early most likely came from.
But before doing so, consider this - If the bat man shooting really happened, why would you need to kill a nurse who tended the victims?
Anyone who actually got shot in a theater would not know what was going to be said, they would just say it like it was, and there would be no reason for the media to differ on those details and no need for a coverup. But WHAT IF:
What if they staged a phony bat man shooting to frame up Holmes so he would be facing a death sentence at the same time his dad was going to hang the bankers with his testimony at the Libor scandal hearings?
What if THEY wanted real bodies?
Why have ANY of them come from the theater?
Why not just get rid of incovenient people to maximize the benefit from the staged event?
If a nurse spoke to someone who was dying, and that dying person,who (for example) had the goods that could have jailed a state senator said something like "I was just getting out of my car after picking up a pizza, was grabbed and shot and now I am here" THAT would be worth killing her for.
Consider the fact that 9 of the "hijackers" from 9/11 were alive later, and consider the fact that representatives from our own governement flew to Egypt and apologized on national television there for this "screw up". The video works, if Youtube says it does not, just click the link above. Youtube often blocks embedded videos on this site:
Consider the fact that NONE of the supposed hijackers were on the boarding logs for the airplanes. There is also no record of any of them even having tickets. And then, ask yourself, if there were 19 hijackers and 9 of them were found alive, WHERE DID THE OTHER ONES GO, IF THEY WERE NOT ON THE PLANES?
911 may paralell Aurora in this way, with the exception of the fact that in the case of 911, someone screwed up and as a result some of the patsies lived. Since the elite have proven that they will vanish people in the name of a psy op as they did on 911, why would Aurora be any different? I believe the bodies they came up with to tag on the bat man shooting were inconvenient people the government wanted eliminated. Once they hit the hospital or coroner's office shot full of holes, who is to say WHERE they really came from before arriving?
This would explain WHY:
There was no CCTV or cell phone footage;
No pictures from inside the theater after the fact;
Why the blood spatters were clean and went the wrong way;
Why the police were talking about where to put the families and press WHILE IT WAS HAPPENING
Why the photos of the mourning family members looked like actors,
How Jessica Redfield witnessed the highly improbable two mass shootings in 1 lifetime,
Why Jessica Redfield hit the SSI database early, after moving to "7 pools and a lake",
The damning tweets,
The dead nurse,
The perfect shut outs on Google and other search engines (IMPOSSIBLE), WHY the Aurora victims ALL got facebook profiles and donation pages in their honor while the Sikhs got NONE, AND the fact that there really may have been dead bodies.
The fact that the bankers benefited so much from this alone is damning in and of itself; and really, if people did or did not die in the theater the point is irrelevant when even a drugged llama would be able to see that both of these shootings were government staged, the first to save the bankers, the second to shut down the release of a damning disclosure movie, and BOTH serving the purpose of restricting or banning guns.
And if you can't agree with me that it's highly probable that no one died in that theater, at least you should be able to see the other motives. No matter what, neither of those shootings were as seen on TV.