Uh Oh, Here Comes the Navy Yard Shooting Psyop (continued)
by JON RAPPOPORT (NO MORE FAKE NEWS.COM)
To boil down the psyop: "it was tragic, and now it’s solved."
One, two. Open wound, closed wound. That's the government/media formula.
In my previous article, I mentioned the psychiatric drug connection as a distinct possibility that haunts every one of these crimes.
Rarely will reporters bother to look into this. It's dicey for them. Exposing pharmaceutical companies and their horrendously toxic drugs is bad for business.
Imagine this front-page NY Times headline: "Four leading physicians state that, in all likelihood, the shooter was on one of the SSRI antidepressants, which can and do push people over into violence, including murder."
Sub-head: "The doctors vow to press the authorities until they get to the bottom of the psychiatric-homicide connection."
Sure. That’s going to happen when a rooster flies a spaceship to the Orion Belt.
If the purported shooter at the Navy Yard, Aaron Alexis (where is/are the other shooters?), was suffering from PTSD, as his family apparently claims, was he seeing a psychiatrist? What was the diagnosis? What drugs were prescribed? What effects do these drugs have?
Perfectly reasonable and legit questions.
Then we have the drills. In a number of these shootings/bombings, official drills that cover the same kind of event that eventually happens were held at the crime scene.
Normal? Or op rehearsals? Desensitization of personnel to the real thing?
It turns out that Navy Citadel Shield security drills were held nationwide, at naval facilities, in February/March of both 2012 and 2013.
From dcmilitary.com, Feb. 28, 2013: "...various training exercises with an emphasis on realism to train personnel. Scenarios included active shooters, mass casualty drills, bomb threats, surveillance, and false credential exercises."
From USA Today, 9/16: Dave Sarr, an environmental engineer, was walking down a nearby street when he saw people running from the Navy Yard. Sarr had seen an evacuation drill a few days earlier at the Navy Yard. “At first I thought it was another drill,” Sarr said. “Then I saw an officer with his weapon drawn.”
The same USA article cites a federal law-enforcement source (off the record) who states that Aaron Alexis, the accused shooter, cleared a Navy Yard security checkpoint in his car.
After parking in the lot, he got into an argument and opened fire on one or two people. He then entered the building where he went on a killing spree.
So did Alexis shoot his way past security guards at the building’s separate checkpoint? Why weren’t the guards waiting for him just outside the building with their weapons drawn, after he, Alexis, had already shot people in the parking lot?
And then, of course, we have the many reports of one or two additional shooters at the Navy Yard. Where is he/they? Authorities now state one of these suspects has been cleared.
In Columbine, Aurora, Sandy Hook, there were reports of “extra” shooters. They faded out in the repetitive media reports of horror, shock, and grief, never to be mentioned again.
*** Jon Rappoport -- author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com
COMMENT: Here is ‘The Profile of the Manipulated Shooting Event,’ developed after lengthy study of similar incidents. See how many fit the latest MK-Ultra victim:
–The ‘uniform’ of all black/camoflage/trenchcoat look worn by the suspect.
–Use of psychotropic drugs like selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors(SSRIs), prescribed by a shrink or ‘counselor.’
–The suspect as scapegoat or patsy, arrested at the scene that includes evidence of other gunmen.
–The lack of any believable motive for the shooter’s acts.
–Evidence of professional training on the part of the shooter, where the victims have all been shot in the head or in the torso, or where there is a very high proportion of hits vs shots fired, or where witnesses noted military-style gun handling skills.
–The arrival of the police on the scene early, coupled with a curiously delayed response in confronting the gunman.
–The involvement of the Feds, usually represented by the FBI or the BATF, in the response or post-shooting investigation, despite it being a purely local crime.
–The connection of the accused to the military, even if just seeing a recruiter.
–Extra guns and ammo found in the auto and at the home of the shooter is a common element in these shootings. This is to convince the public of the guilt of the accused. Closely related to this is an excessive quantity of ammo carried by the suspect, to impress the public of gunman’s homicidal intent.
–The strange lack of emotion on the face of the gunman during the shooting, often described as robotic or vacant. Often coupled with an inability to remember the event if the suspect lives.
–An early timeframe for the shootings, so that the trauma will dominate the day’s headlines.
–New laws in the wake of the shooting to further restrict the freedom to own firearms, and/or onerous new ‘security’ regulations.