FBI Lies: From OK City Bombing to Boston Bombing (continued) by JON RAPPOPORT
Other photos should not be deemed credible, and they unnecessarily divert the public's attention in the wrong direction, and create undo work for vital law-enforcement resources."
Translation: Ignore all the images uncovered by independent researchers, citizen reporters, bloggers. Forget, for example, about photos of those men who appear to work for Craft International, a private security contractor, who were standing at the finish line of the Marathon. We, the FBI, are running this show. We're the pros, we deal, you behave.
NBC's Brian Williams, the Unctuous One, in his lead-in to the press conference, said: "It's been twenty-four hours of fits and starts, and false reports on people who have been pursued in this investigation, including folks who have been identified through photography, but this will be the word from the FBI."
Translation: The guessing is over. Drum roll. The F B I has the real goods. Those other photos arenâ€™t officially certified by law-enforcement, or by us, the fawning water carriers for the Bureau and DHS. And that unfortunate and cruel detention of the Saudi lad, who was misidentified as a suspect, but later released, his travel visa now revoked, his deportation back to Saudi Arabia underway, after an unscheduled meeting between Obama and the Saudi foreign minister? Means nothing. We were informed by reliable sources that it means nothing. We decide what's relevant, we give it to you and you take it.
Richard DesLauriers, who starred in the FBI press conference, made his bones at the Bureau by engineering the exchange of 10 Russian sleeper agents in the US for four CIA agents who were in prison in Russia. That was his big career move.
The Russian sleeper agents had been operating under the nose of the FBI in the US, who, in typical fashion, weren't making any arrests. They were just tracking these Russian spies and watching them, for more than 10 years, as the spies passed across intelligence to their Russian controls.
This was a very delicate exchange, mainly because FBI field agents a) didn't want to let the Russians go back home and escape prosecution and b) because the FBI and the CIA hate each other, and the FBI people weren't all that enthused about the value of the deal. Bring home four CIA people in return for releasing 10 Russian sleeper agents? Nothing to celebrate there.
So now Richard DesLauriers is telling the American people: look at the photos of the two men on the FBIâ€™s radar and nobody else. Ignore all other photos and all other information.
Harken back, if you will, to another bombing incident. Oklahoma City, in 1995. The Murrah Federal Building. Remember? Tim McVeigh? The FBI was cooking the books on that one all the way.
Just one example: A secret Department of Justice report on the bombing was presented to a very select audience. This DOJ report wasn't undertaken voluntarily. No.
FBI whistleblower Frederic Whitehurst had forced it to happen, because he'd gone public and said the FBI lab had fabricated evidence in the McVeigh case.
Serious evidence. It turned out there was no reason to believe ammonium nitrate (fertilizer) had been the main explosive used to blow apart the Federal Building on the morning of April 19, 1995. A FBI lab supervisor named David Williams had decided ammonium nitrate was the substance because defendant Terry Nichols possessed a receipt for its purchase.
So Williams made the lab evidence look like it confirmed ammonium nitrate. But it didn't.
The DOJ report detailing all this was so damning, the judge in the McVeigh trial ran away from it like a wild horse. He refused to allow the report into evidence. He forbade it from being discussed at all.
Why was this so crucial? Because independent bomb experts had gone on the record with a quite different scenario. I interviewed three of them. They agreed that an ammonium nitrate bomb, in the Ryder truck at the curb, parked in front of the Federal Building, could not have caused the profile of damage sustained by the building. Impossible.
Therefore, McVeigh, whatever he was guilty or not guilty of, had accomplices. Professionals, who had wired charges into the columns of the structure. These charges had wrought the real destruction.
But the FBI did everything in its power to focus on McVeigh and and the amateur Nichols only. They ruled out every other lead, and there were plenty of them.
The FBI essentially said, "These are the two suspects. Don't look for anybody else. Pay no attention to anyone who says there are other perpetrators. They're crazies. We know the truth."
Just like now.
In 1995, Americans completely bought into the false FBI evidence and story.
Once the FBI rolls and the news media back up the FBI, it's a fait accompli. The public automatically follows suit. How could things be any different? How could so many resources be devoted to anything but the truth?
"The FBI killed one terrorist. Now they have his brother, the other bomber, surrounded. This is it. This is the only story. Everything else is nonsense."
Yes, no, and maybe are reduced to yes.
"The FBI would never have come this far with the case if they didn't have things right."
Yes, that was exactly the mindset in Oklahoma City in 1995. Until it wasn't. Until independent researchers uncovered miles of undiscovered information about other suspects and FBI lies.
*** Jon Rappoport: The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com